Support new getter syntax (no formal parameter list)

Support new getter syntax (no formal parameter list)

Support both new and old getter syntax in the VM compiler.
One co19 test becomes invalid, as it expects a compile error
due to missing getter formal parameters.
Committed: https://code.google.com/p/dart/source/detail?r=10541

[regis, 2012-08-10 22:41:07]

LGTM

http://codereview.chromium.org/10837208/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.h
File runtime/vm/object.h (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/10837208/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.h#newcode1526
runtime/vm/object.h:1526: // Returns true if this function represents a getter.
You should comment that implicit getters are not recognized
(RawFunction::kImplicitGetter or RawFunction::kConstImplicitGetter)
Btw, why not?

http://codereview.chromium.org/10837208/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.h#newcode1532
runtime/vm/object.h:1532: bool IsSetterFunction() const {
You should comment that implicit setters are not recognized
(RawFunction::kImplicitSetter)

[hausner, 2012-08-10 22:51:01]

Thank you.

http://codereview.chromium.org/10837208/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.h
File runtime/vm/object.h (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/10837208/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.h#newcode1526
runtime/vm/object.h:1526: // Returns true if this function represents a getter.
On 2012/08/10 22:41:08, regis wrote:
> You should comment that implicit getters are not recognized
> (RawFunction::kImplicitGetter or RawFunction::kConstImplicitGetter)
> Btw, why not?

Done. I just wanted to replace the "kind == kGetterFunction"  that appears at
several places in our code.

http://codereview.chromium.org/10837208/diff/1/runtime/vm/object.h#newcode1532
runtime/vm/object.h:1532: bool IsSetterFunction() const {
On 2012/08/10 22:41:08, regis wrote:
> You should comment that implicit setters are not recognized
> (RawFunction::kImplicitSetter)

Done.