Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(4)

Issue 10383215: Add expiration check into dart.js script. (Closed)

Created:
8 years, 7 months ago by Anton Muhin
Modified:
8 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
vsm, podivilov
CC:
reviews_dartlang.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+3 lines, -1 line) Patch
M client/dart.js View 1 chunk +3 lines, -1 line 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4 (0 generated)
Anton Muhin
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-16 16:59:48 UTC) #1
vsm
lgtm https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10383215/diff/1/client/dart.js File client/dart.js (right): https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10383215/diff/1/client/dart.js#newcode7 client/dart.js:7: if (navigator.webkitStartDart()) { Minor nit: I'd suggest changing ...
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-16 19:14:01 UTC) #2
Anton Muhin
https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10383215/diff/1/client/dart.js File client/dart.js (right): https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10383215/diff/1/client/dart.js#newcode7 client/dart.js:7: if (navigator.webkitStartDart()) { We need to think out landing ...
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-17 14:20:28 UTC) #3
vsm
8 years, 7 months ago (2012-05-17 15:30:56 UTC) #4
On 2012/05/17 14:20:28, antonmuhin wrote:
> https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10383215/diff/1/client/dart.js
> File client/dart.js (right):
> 
> https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10383215/diff/1/client/dart.js#newcode7
> client/dart.js:7: if (navigator.webkitStartDart()) {
> We need to think out landing process as if I change C++ implementation, people
> we fresh builds will be told to upgrade, but there will be no warning to
people
> with outdated builds.
> 
> wdyt, should we change it or maybe leave it as is now?
> 

Your call.  Hopefully, we'll figure a way around it in the long term anyway.

> On 2012/05/16 19:14:01, vsm wrote:
> > Minor nit: I'd suggest changing failure from true to false.  I.e., it'd be
> more
> > intuitive to have webkitStartDart return false if it fails.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698